Create a PowerPoint presentation of 16 slides for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-

  

Create a PowerPoint presentation of 16 slides for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-IV).Address and include the following in your PowerPoint:A title, introduction, and conclusion slideWhat is the MCMI-IV and what does it measure?What are the legal and ethical requirements for a professional to administer, interpret, and/or report the results of an MCMI-IV?How would information gathered from the MCMI-IV assist in the intake and treatment planning process?Describe potential treatment strategies that would likely be incorporated into a treatment plan based on results from an MCMI-IV.Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50 words.A reference slide with a minimum of four scholarly references in addition to the textbook.I have attached thr Rubric. Please follow it.
rubric_print_format__3_.xlsx

rubric_print_format__3_.xlsx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Create a PowerPoint presentation of 16 slides for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code
PCN-644
Class Code
PCN-644-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
MCMI-IV and What it Measures
10.0%
Legal and Ethical Requirements (administration,
interpretation, and reporting)
20.0%
Intake and Treatment Planning Process
20.0%
Potential Treatment Strategies
20.0%
Detailed Speaker Notes
5.0%
Presentation of Content
5.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
MCMI-IV PowerPoint Presentation
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Does not identify what the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is or what it
measures.
Does not include legal and ethical requirements.
Does not discuss how gathered information assists the intake
and treatment planning processes.
Does not include potential treatment strategies.
The presentation does not contain speaker notes.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
220.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV was identified, but a less than
appropriate description of what it measures is included. The
description is unclear or inappropriate for the MCMI-IV.
Demonstrates poor understanding of the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV
and what it measures.
Gives details of the legal and ethical requirements in a less
than satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate
requirements related to administration, interpretation,
and/or reporting are listed. Demonstrates poor
understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Describes how gathered information assists the intake and
treatment planning processes in a less than satisfactory
manner. The description is unclear or inappropriate for the
content. Demonstrates poor understanding of how gathered
information can assist in processes.
Gives details of treatment strategies in a less than
satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate strategies are
listed. Demonstrates poor understanding of potential
treatment strategies to incorporate.
The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or
inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some
lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV was identified, and an appropriate
description of what it measures is included. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV and what it
measures.
Minimally details the legal and ethical requirements. A
limited grasp of the requirements for administration,
interpretation, and/or reporting is shown. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Minimally describes how gathered information assists the
intake and treatment planning processes. A limited grasp of
the information and processes is shown. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of how gathered information can assist
in processes.
Minimally details treatment strategies. A limited grasp of
potential strategies is shown. Demonstrates a basic
understanding of potential treatment strategies to
incorporate.
The presentation’s speaker notes are present and are
generally competent.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is identified and the description of
what it measures is very appropriate. Description of
measurement is clearly articulated, with some evidence to
support claims. Demonstrates a good understanding of the
MCMI-IVMCMI-IV and what it measures.
Adequately details the legal and ethical requirements.
Requirements for administration, interpretation, and
reporting are appropriate and the description shows why
they are necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding of
the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Adequately details how gathered information assists the
intake and treatment planning processes. Information and
processes are appropriate and show why they are necessary.
Demonstrates a good understanding of how gathered
information can assist in processes.
Adequately details treatment strategies. Potential strategies
are appropriate and the description shows why strategies are
relevant and necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding
of potential treatment strategies to incorporate.
The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that
indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in
person.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is identified and the description of
what it measures is completely appropriate. Description of
measurement is comprehensively articulated, with strong
evidence to support claims; rationale is virtually flawless.
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the MCMIIVMCMI-IV and what it measures.
Comprehensively details the legal and ethical requirements.
Requirements for administration, interpretation, and
reporting are comprehensive and completely appropriate.
Description clearly details why all are necessary; rationale is
virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional
understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Comprehensively details how gathered information assists
the intake and treatment planning processes. Information
and processes are comprehensive and completely
appropriate. Description clearly details the interrelation of
each; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of how gathered information can
Comprehensively details treatment strategies. Potential
strategies are comprehensive and completely appropriate.
Description clearly details why all strategies are relevant and
necessary; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of potential strategies to
incorporate.
The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that
give a complete picture of what would be said if the
presentation were given in person.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Course Code
PCN-644
Class Code
PCN-644-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
MCMI-IV and What it Measures
10.0%
Legal and Ethical Requirements (administration,
interpretation, and reporting)
20.0%
Intake and Treatment Planning Process
20.0%
Potential Treatment Strategies
20.0%
Detailed Speaker Notes
5.0%
Presentation of Content
5.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
MCMI-IV PowerPoint Presentation
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Does not identify what the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is or what it
measures.
Does not include legal and ethical requirements.
Does not discuss how gathered information assists the intake
and treatment planning processes.
Does not include potential treatment strategies.
The presentation does not contain speaker notes.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
220.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV was identified, but a less than
appropriate description of what it measures is included. The
description is unclear or inappropriate for the MCMI-IV.
Demonstrates poor understanding of the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV
and what it measures.
Gives details of the legal and ethical requirements in a less
than satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate
requirements related to administration, interpretation,
and/or reporting are listed. Demonstrates poor
understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Describes how gathered information assists the intake and
treatment planning processes in a less than satisfactory
manner. The description is unclear or inappropriate for the
content. Demonstrates poor understanding of how gathered
information can assist in processes.
Gives details of treatment strategies in a less than
satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate strategies are
listed. Demonstrates poor understanding of potential
treatment strategies to incorporate.
The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or
inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some
lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV was identified, and an appropriate
description of what it measures is included. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of the MCMI-IVMCMI-IV and what it
measures.
Minimally details the legal and ethical requirements. A
limited grasp of the requirements for administration,
interpretation, and/or reporting is shown. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Minimally describes how gathered information assists the
intake and treatment planning processes. A limited grasp of
the information and processes is shown. Demonstrates a
basic understanding of how gathered information can assist
in processes.
Minimally details treatment strategies. A limited grasp of
potential strategies is shown. Demonstrates a basic
understanding of potential treatment strategies to
incorporate.
The presentation’s speaker notes are present and are
generally competent.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is identified and the description of
what it measures is very appropriate. Description of
measurement is clearly articulated, with some evidence to
support claims. Demonstrates a good understanding of the
MCMI-IVMCMI-IV and what it measures.
Adequately details the legal and ethical requirements.
Requirements for administration, interpretation, and
reporting are appropriate and the description shows why
they are necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding of
the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Adequately details how gathered information assists the
intake and treatment planning processes. Information and
processes are appropriate and show why they are necessary.
Demonstrates a good understanding of how gathered
information can assist in processes.
Adequately details treatment strategies. Potential strategies
are appropriate and the description shows why strategies are
relevant and necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding
of potential treatment strategies to incorporate.
The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that
indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in
person.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
The MCMI-IVMCMI-IV is identified and the description of
what it measures is completely appropriate. Description of
measurement is comprehensively articulated, with strong
evidence to support claims; rationale is virtually flawless.
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the MCMIIVMCMI-IV and what it measures.
Comprehensively details the legal and ethical requirements.
Requirements for administration, interpretation, and
reporting are comprehensive and completely appropriate.
Description clearly details why all are necessary; rationale is
virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional
understanding of the requirements of the MCMI-IV.
Comprehensively details how gathered information assists
the intake and treatment planning processes. Information
and processes are comprehensive and completely
appropriate. Description clearly details the interrelation of
each; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of how gathered information can
Comprehensively details treatment strategies. Potential
strategies are comprehensive and completely appropriate.
Description clearly details why all strategies are relevant and
necessary; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of potential strategies to
incorporate.
The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that
give a complete picture of what would be said if the
presentation were given in person.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more