After reading the attached material, answer the following questions in a minimum 250 words or more.A


After reading the attached material, answer the following questions in a minimum 250 words or more.Any citing must be done in APA Format. You have read about the importance of culture within the company. This involves both understanding the diverse cultures within our company as well as creating a positive corporate culture within the company itself. Using the terms from this week’s reading, please explain how this relates to an organization that you are familiar with (past or present employment). Is this organization successful in dealing with diversity? How? What is the culture within this company? While you are not required to formally cite your sources within the forum, you should make sure that you are incorporating information from the readings into your responses. Your responses should clearly show that you have read the material.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
After reading the attached material, answer the following questions in a minimum 250 words or more.A
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Journal of Social Change
2016, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 39–47
©Walden University, LLC, Minneapolis, MN
DOI: 10.5590/JOSC.2016.08.1.04
Why Culture Matters in Business Research
Gene E. Fusch
Walden University
Christina J. Fusch
Walden University
Janet M. Booker
Walden University
Patricia I. Fusch
Walden University
Organizations today are changing rapidly due to technology, globalization, and cutting-edge
production, subsequently morphing into new structures and workflow processes.
Organizations are becoming more diverse in terms of gender, age, race, ethnicity, veteran
status, sexual orientation, and others. The business workplace is not the melting pot that
many were taught about, but that of the ethnic salad, blended yet distinct. The core of
organizational composition worldwide still remains within the human resource realm for a
shared and cohesive culture is behind the success of every company. The study of workplace
culture is important for business research to ascertain the construct of the successful
organization. The article begins with a discussion about culture, relates culture to the
workplace, and ends relating important business research to workplace culture. The
intended audience is business management majors and instructors.
Keywords: culture, ethnography, organizational success, productivity and performance, business
Why does culture matter, or, more importantly, what is culture? In the Middle East, archaeologists
search for ancient cultures in giant hills of dirt called tells, derived from the Arabic word for hill (AlNahar, 2010). This is one way to think of culture. Think of lives as hills of culture: holistic,
integrated, learned, linguistic, and shared (C. J. Fusch, 2014). Culture is holistic, all
inclusive. Everything in one’s life, whether it be the economy, the workplace, family, religion,
hobbies, table manners, or education, makes up one’s culture (Botz-Bornstein, 2012). Culture is the
way in which each interacts with another, a set of rules for beliefs and behavior that all follow to be
members of society (Botz-Bornstein, 2012). Business related to cultural theory is “unlike studying
culture in well-defined communities, organizational scholars study its assumptions and beliefs
alongside strategies, structures, control systems, technologies, and business models” (Murphy,
Cooke, & Lopez, 2013, p. 662).
Please address queries to: Gene E. Fusch, Walden University. Email:
Fusch et al., 2016
Culture is integrated, with each element connected and influencing another (Abdollahi-Guilani,
Yasin, Hua, & Agahaei, 2012). One cannot isolate certain aspects of a culture without producing a
distorted viewpoint (Abdollahi-Guilani et al., 2012). These aspects are interlinked, directly impacting
one another to create the current situation (Abdollahi-Guilani et al, 2012). Culture is learned; in fact,
it must be learned. It is not biological. For example, eating is necessary to live, but how and what
one eats may be determined by one’s culture (C. J. Fusch, 2014). Religious sanctions on certain types
of food in the Middle East best represent the learned nature of a culture (Ambail & Bakar,
2013). These food restrictions are not self-evident, rather they must be taught in order to be followed
(Ambail & Bakar, 2013).
Culture is shared; for a belief or behavior to be considered cultural, it must be shared (Harris, Mayo,
Prince, & Tooey, 2013). It must be considered appropriate by the society to be a custom (Nnadi,
2013). Language is one of the most obviously shared elements of a culture (Abdollahi-Guilani et al.,
2012). Along with shared history, language is often used to define what scholars consider a culture
(Abdollahi-Guilani et al., 2012; C. J. Fusch, 2014). In this sense, culture is also linguistic (C. J.
Fusch, 2014).
So then, to take one back to the original question, why does culture matter in business research? An
anthropological answer would be because culture defines everything that one is from childhood to
elderly age and it encompasses all one does and tries to do (C. J. Fusch, 2014). All breathe in a
biological system, but one must live in a cultural context so one knows what to do beyond the
biological necessities of eating and sleeping (C. J. Fusch, 2014). Indeed, whether from the Tells of
ancient civilizations to the modern business world of today, culture is human interaction (C. J.
Fusch, 2014) and the core of every business is within the human resource realm.
History of Culture in the Workplace
Globalization has a profound impact on today’s leader and the workplace (Weadick, 2005). The
leader must adapt management style, roles, duties, and strategies (Kumar, Anjum, & Sinha, 2011;
Matviuk, 2010; Müller, Spang, & Ozcan, 2008; Seah, Hsieh, & Huang, 2014) in order to work with
diverse peoples of cultures other than his or her own (Jyh-Shen, & Tung-Zong, 2009; Prewitt, Weil, &
McClure, 2011; Rockstuhl, Dulebohn, Ang, & Shore, 2012; Sultana, 2013). The workplace may be in
the leader’s own country, or the leader may be transferred elsewhere in the world to work (Littrell,
2013). The leader must also deal with post-9/11 concerns with safety and security, as well as
anticapitalism backlash in addition to the outsourcing of essential jobs (Deitchman, 2013).
At the turn of the 20th century, managerial skills were based upon the functional approach, wherein
performance was based upon the achievement of set goals (G. E. Fusch & Gillespie, 2012; Godfrey &
Mahoney, 2014). Therefore, it was the manager’s responsibility to monitor the attainment of the set
goals, as well as correct methods and procedures as needed to reach those goals (Godfrey &
Mahoney, 2014). Researchers such as Frederick Taylor, Henry Mintzberg, and Henri Fayol appeared
to be more focused on the task at hand, rather than the persons performing the tasks (G. Fusch,
2001); therefore, workplace culture did not necessarily matter. The research of Robert Katz as well
as Fred Luthans emphasized the human resource dimension of management, recognizing that some
of the best managers of the functional approach may be competent on the technical end, yet unable
to achieve organizational goals through inability to motivate people (Peterson & Van Fleet, 2004).
Indeed, organizational behavior is an applied behavioral science that utilizes and combines other
disciplines into a model effective for the understanding of organizations (Babcock-Roberson &
Strickland, 2010; Down, 2012). The field of anthropology has been referred to as the forgotten science
Journal of Social Change
Fusch et al., 2016
of behavioral studies due to factors specific to this discipline (Morey & Luthans, 2013). Anthropology
may be perceived as an inexact science with no formal rules, a combination of art and science, due to
its emphasis on ethnography (Bernard, 2011). The anthropologist becomes the participant/observer
in the native culture, looking out from the native eyes, to study and better understand humans and
human activity (Lavenda & Schultz, 2010). Particular attention is paid to observing and interacting
using qualitative methods as opposed to using quantitative statistical models in other disciplines
(Jackson, 1990).
Perhaps anthropology’s greatest contribution to organizational behavior is its emphasis on the
ability to facilitate understanding between peoples in other countries or organizations (Down, 2012;
Lavenda & Schultz, 2010). This learning about cultures is accomplished by noting differences in
values, attitudes, and behavior (Lavenda & Schultz, 2010). Rather than focusing on the individual,
as in other disciplines, the focus here is on the macro level, as in group processes and organization
(Anand, 2013). This cultural understanding is particularly important in today’s workplace as people
and organizations learn to manage diversity and globalization, whether one is assigned to another
country or becomes a member of a virtual team (Daim et al., 2012).
The Cultural Context of Leadership and Management: Managing Across
Timelines, Continents, and Culture
In the contemporary business environment, company leaders face continual change that can hamper
attempts to remain profitable (Dekkers, 2011). Organizational leader attempts at mergers and
reengineering attempts often fail, consultants are of little help, and strategic planning is ineffective
(Boniface & Rashmi, 2012). Management and leadership lack adequate understanding of problems
and their solutions because they cannot see the issues, are unaware of choices and alternatives, and
lack the skill to implement a correction (Bolman & Deal, 2013). When companies become more
flexible and fluid, the company leaders are able to respond to an ever-fluctuating business
environment (Dominici & Palumbo, 2013). These challenges encompass rapid technological change,
the pressure of the competitive marketplace, rising production costs, cutting-edge alterations,
scarcity of resource input, changing worker needs and demands, increasing operational costs and
potential taxes, and intensifying governmental regulations regarding health care (Laroche &
Wechtler, 2011; Meadors, 2010; Söderholm & Norrbin, 2013).
Organizational behavior now has a global face. Organizational leaders need to personify the different
values of cultures in different countries, in order to be effective (Sultana, Rashid, Mohiuddin, &
Hudam, 2013). Globalization was perhaps the most frequently used buzz word of the 1990s
(Weadick, 2005). The word is still popular today and often misused by most, its definition used to
describe whatever the user wishes it to mean, whether positive or negative (Weadick, 2005). The
descriptive term globalization has also been used in place of international and multicultural, as well
as transnational (Cristian & Raluca, 2010). Its definition over time has become so muddled as to
facilitate the pejorative term globaloney (Lutz, 1989), a word coined by Representative Clare Boothe
Luce in her inaugural speech to Congress in 1943.
Transglobal companies now reflect the increasing diversity of the workforce rather than representing
a host country (Brimhall, Lizano, & Mor Barak, 2014). Furthermore, organizational culture now has
a greater impact on productivity than national culture, as workers adapt to a workplace that
transcends their nationality (Uddin, Luva, & Hossian, 2013). This is posited to have an impact on
managerial practices for the future as management actively seeks to “create, maintain, and change
the organizational culture” (Naor, Linderman, & Schroeder, 2010, p. 195).
Journal of Social Change
Fusch et al., 2016
To be sure, leaders in contemporary multicultural organizations must master context to understand
culture (Bennis, 2009) while managing and leading in an environment where there are no common
definitions of efficient outcome or effectiveness. It is imperative that organizations address cultural
differences when managing diverse work forces (Brimhall et al., 2014). Symbolic assumptions are not
what happens but what it means, events have multiple meanings, and people create meanings
(Barrett, 2012). Moreover, “[c]ulture is the glue that holds an organization together and unites
people around shared values and beliefs…the interwoven patterns of beliefs, values, practices, and
artifacts that defines for members who they are and how they are to do things” (Bolman & Deal,
2003, p. 243). Culture has a specialized language, a history, values, shared identity, ritual, and
ceremony (C. J. Fusch, 2014). It is important to find the meaning, for “. . . human actions cannot be
understood unless the meaning that humans assign to them is understood” (Marshall & Rossman,
2016, p. 101). Furthermore, the world is made of multiple realities rather than a static state;
therefore, all realities are relevant and valid (Elanain, 2013; Erlingsson & Brysiewicz, 2013).
Research Regarding Culture in the Workplace
Booker (2011) noted that ethnographic researchers explore a culture from the views of those on the
inside of the culture. Corporate ethnographers use “. . . technical reports, powerpoint presentations,
workshops, diagnostic exercises, video presentations, etc.” (Fayard & Van Maanen, 2015, p. 6) to
present findings. In the same respect, leaders could internally analyze what is working in their
culture and what is not in an effort to build a work culture that supports the objectives of the
organization (G. E. Fusch, 2001; P. I. Fusch & Fusch, 2015; Hodson, 2008). One distinctive strategy
for business leaders to follow might be to focus on what type of culture makes an organization
“succeed instead of fail” (Booker, 2011, p. 105). The motivators that subcultures create can lead to an
increase in organizational performance (Booker, 2011). The significance to business leadership may
be to examine the subcultures they “could apply to the population of workers they are attempting to
motivate, which could include the importance of continued job training” (p. 106), and winning the
approval of others such as a boss, coworkers, or family members (Booker, 2011). Leaders need to
know what to build into their culture to help implement change tactics into existing programs to
produce the desired results for the organization (G. E. Fusch, 2001). Workers want to feel they have
worth and understanding and it is their work culture that can breed a sense of satisfaction into their
daily tasks (P. I. Fusch & Fusch, 2015; Yafang, 2011). To be sure, in terms of business research, the
use of an ethnographic design and of cultural perspective demonstrates the importance of the study
(Freeman & Spanjaard, 2012; Gordon, 2011).
G. E. Fusch (2001) found that in a culture where leadership promoted and demonstrated validation
and valuing behaviors, workers wanted to go to work in the morning and endeavored to help the
company succeed. In contrast, a rapidly changing workplace environment where workers feel out of
control, unaware of the changes, and sometimes afraid can lead to reluctance to the interest of the
organization (Palombo, 2013). In Palombo’s (2013) mini-ethnographic study, he found strategies the
leader in one small machine shop used to improve the workplace culture while overcoming resistance
to change. From a research perspective, the importance of studying the culture enables one to look at
the interactions in the workplace for “although we cannot see attitudes, we can see working
behavior” (G. E. Fusch & Gillespie, 2012, p. 94). Every workplace has a specific culture and
ethnographic research enables the researcher to understand that culture.
Journal of Social Change
Fusch et al., 2016
The diversity of the workforce impacts the leader of today. Organizations are becoming more diverse
in terms of gender, age, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation (Robbins & Judge, 2014). These
differences are those among people within a given country and include such categories as gender,
age, race, ethnicity, veteran status, sexual orientation and others. Indeed, the organization today is
not the melting pot that many were taught in public school, but that of the ethnic salad, blended yet
distinct. Moreover, culture must be socially acceptable and consistent with needs and values.
Organizations are composed of people who get the job done, united by a common workplace culture
(Bolman & Deal, 2013), for a shared and cohesive culture is behind the success of every company.
The core of organizational composition remains in the human resource realm, where needs and
wants remain basically the same as they have always been, for meaningful, creative work, and
recognition and reward in the workplace (Bolman & Deal, 2013). Indeed, organizations today are
changing rapidly due to technology, globalization, and cutting-edge production, subsequently
morphing into new structures and workflow processes (Narasimhan, Krull, & Nahm, 2012; Voegtlin,
Patzer, & Scherer, 2012). A common culture in the workplace is essential for business success
(Booker, 2011; G. Fusch, 2001; P. I. Fusch & Fusch, 2015); therefore, the study of workplace culture
is important for business research.
Abdollahi-Guilani, M., Yasin, M. S. M., Hua, T. K., & Agahaei, K. (2012). Culture-integrated
teaching for the enhancement of EFL learner tolerance. Asian Social Science, 8, 115–120.
Retrieved from
Al-Nahar, M. (2010). Tell Abu Suwwan, A neolithic site in Jordan: Preliminary report on the 2005
and 2006 field seasons. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 357, 1–18.
Retrieved from
Ambail, A. R., & Bakar, A. N. (2013). Halal food and products in Malaysia: People’s awareness and
policy implications. Intellectual Discourse, 21, 7–32. Retrieved from
Anand, V. (2013). Organizational behavior: A conceptual study required for organization
performance and existence. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour and
Management Perspectives, 2, 629–633.
Babcock-Roberson, M., & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership,
work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Psychology, 144,
313–326. Retrieved from
Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotions are real. Emotion, 12, 413–429. doi:10.1037/a0027555
Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader (4th ed.). New York, NY: Basic.
Bernard, R. H. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd
ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Journal of Social Change
Fusch et al., 2016
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (5th
ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boniface, M., & Rashmi, M. (2012). Outsourcing: Mass layoffs and displaced workers’ experiences.
Management Research Review, 35, 1029–1045. doi:10.1108/01409171211276927
Booker, J. M. (2011). A descriptive analysis of high school student motivators for success (Doctoral
dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3471687)
Botz-Bornstein, T. (2012). What is the difference between culture and civilization? Two hundred fifty
years of confusion. Comparative Civilizations Review, 66, 10–28.
Brimhall, K. C., Lizano, E. L., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2014). The mediating role of inclusion: A
longitudinal study of the effects of leader-member exchange and diversity climate on job
satisfaction and intention to leave among child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services
Review, 40, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.003
Cristian, S., & Raluca, I. O. (2010). Beyond the borders of globalization EU-Africa, economy and
conflict. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 12, 589–593.
Daim, T. U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012).
Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams, International Journal of
Project Management, 30, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004
Deitchman, S. (2013). Enhancing crisis leadership in public health emergencies. Disaster Medicine
and Public Health Preparedness, 7, 534–540. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.81
Dekkers, R. (2011). Impact of strategic decision making for outsourcing on managing manufacturing.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 935–965.
Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). Decoding the Japanese lean production system according to a
viable systems perspective. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 26, 153–171.
Down, S. (2012). A h …
Purchase answer to see full

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more