A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this as

  

A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing or medicine to critique.Articles used for one assignment can’t be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each assignment).The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and systemic review should not be used.Mixed-methods studies should not be used.Your critique should include the following:Research Problem/PurposeState the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?State the purpose of the research.Review of the LiteratureIdentify the concepts explored in the literature review.Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?Theoretical FrameworkAre the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/AssumptionsWhat are the independent and dependent variables in this study?Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?MethodologyWhat type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools.Were ethical considerations addressed?Data AnalysisWhat data analysis tool was used?How were the results presented in the study?Identify at least one (1) finding.Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and RecommendationsWhat are the strengths and limitations of the study?In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing.The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines.
rubric_detail_summative_assignment.docx

critique_of_research_article_sample.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this as
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this
item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS350-Research Critique
Description: This rubric is used to evaluate the Research Critique Assignment in NURS350.
Exit


Grid View
List View
Accomplished
Emerging
Research Problem/Purpose
Points Range:22.4 (8.00%) – 28 (10.00%)
Research problem, purpose of
research, and relevance to nursing are
clearly identified.
Points Range:16.8 (6.00%) 22.12 (7.90%)
Research problem, purpose of
research, and relevance to nursing are
somewhat identified.
Review of the Literature
Points Range:33.6 (12.00%) – 42 (15.00%)
Concepts explored in the literature
review are clearly identified. Critique of
the references is included and well
developed.
Points Range:25.2 (9.00%) 33.18 (11.85%)
Concepts explored in the literature
review are somewhat identified.
Critique of the references is included,
but may not be fully developed.
Theoretical Framework
Points Range:22.4 (8.00%) – 28 (10.00%)
A theoretical concept/framework is
identified and well analyzed for
appropriateness. If the article lacks a
concept/framework, a suitable one is
suggested.
Points Range:16.8 (6.00%) 22.12 (7.90%)
A theoretical concept/framework is
somewhat identified and analyzed for
appropriateness. If the article lacks a
concept/framework, a potential
concept/framework is suggested, but it
is somewhat inappropriate.
Variables, Hypotheses, Questions, and
Assumptions
Points Range:11.2 (4.00%) – 14 (5.00%)
IV and DV are identified and defined.
Discussion on measurability is
included. Research question and
hypothesis are identified.
Points Range:8.4 (3.00%) – 11.06 (3.95%)
IV and DV are somewhat identified
and or partially defined. Discussion on
measurability is somewhat included.
Research question and hypothesis are
partially identified.
Methodology
Points Range:44.8 (16.00%) – 56 (20.00%)
Type of design, sample size, study
population, sampling method, and type
of reasoning are properly identified.
Reliability and validity of measurement
tools, ethical considerations, and
probability vs. non-probability sampling
are discussed.
Points Range:33.6 (12.00%) 44.24 (15.80%)
Type of design, sample size, study
population, sampling method, and type
of reasoning are somewhat identified.
Reliability and validity of measurement
tools, ethical considerations, and
probability vs. non-probability sampling
are discussed, but some information is
inaccurate.
Accomplished
Emerging
Data Analysis
Points Range:33.6 (12.00%) – 42 (15.00%)
Data analysis tool is identified. An
explanation on how the results are
presented in the study is included and
accurate. At least one finding is
appropriately identified.
Points Range:25.2 (9.00%) 33.18 (11.85%)
Data analysis tool is somewhat
identified. An incomplete explanation
on how the results are presented in
the study is included. At least one
finding is identified.
Summary, Conclusions, Implications,
and Recommendations
Points Range:44.8 (16.00%) – 56 (20.00%)
Strengths and limitations of the study
are identified. A discussion on whether
or not the study can be generalized is
included. An evaluation of the findings,
conclusions, and significance to
nursing is included and appropriate.
Points Range:33.6 (12.00%) 44.24 (15.80%)
Strengths and limitations of the study
are somewhat identified. A discussion
on whether or not the study can be
generalized is included but may not be
fully developed. An evaluation of the
findings, conclusions, and significance
to nursing may not be fully developed.
Mechanics and APA Format
Points Range:11.2 (4.00%) – 14 (5.00%)
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and
organized manner. Responses are
mostly error free. Information from
sources is appropriately paraphrased
and accurately cited.
Points Range:8.4 (3.00%) – 11.06 (3.95%)
Writing is generally clear and
organized but is not concise or formal
in language. Multiple errors exist in
spelling and grammar with minor
interference with readability or
comprehension. Most information from
sources is correctly paraphrased and
cited.
Running Head: CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
1
Title Page would be here.
Critique Research Article
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the ability to critically read and
understand an investigative study. I have chosen the research article “A case study exploring the
experience of graduate entry nursing students when learning in practice”. According to Stacey et
CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
2
al. (2015) there is complex background turbulence during the process of achieving a nursing
degree. There is some controversy as to the methods used to educate nurses. This creates a
potential challenging environment for newly graduated students. The purpose of this article is to
explore how new nursing students presents themselves in an environment where stereotypes
criticize their capabilities during their provisional period. This article directly relates to nursing
by gathering information that describes the challenges that most if not all nurses come across as
they gain experience in their nursing career.
The information used in this article is current, updated and published within a ten-year
window from todays date. The development of hypotheses used in this study were integrated
from already theorize studies relating to this topic. Such as “Current nurse education is failing to
promote capability, criticality and flexibility amongst the nursing workforce” (Watson 2006,
Roberts et al. 2009), “GEN students possess a range of specific attributes which are beneficial to
nursing graduateness” (Hackett & McLafferty 2006, Raines 2009, Neil 2012, Stacey et al. 2014),
“GEN student are likely to feel hostility from established nurses in practice due to their academic
qualifications” (Brookfield 1993, McKenna et al. 2006) and “GEN students are perceived as
unwilling or unable to engage in caring activity as a result to intellectual ability” (Watson &
Thompson 2000, McKenna et al. 2006, Watson 2006). Concepts explored in this study was
analyzed as “exploration of a contemporary phenomenon in a real life context when the
boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident” (Stacey et al., 2015). With
this said this study has the possibility to challenge, extend or confirm already existing theories.
The theoretical framework of this article is considered to be related to the research by
nursing theories and social discipline. The framework of the research includes theoretical
sampling strategy using selected group of students to participate in a two-year research study.
CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
3
There are other disciplines also involved in this study, social discipline is seen throughout this
study as students learn to co-exist into the nursing environment. The framework used in this
study is a comparison of gathered data, and compered with already existing research.
A dependent variable found in this article is education performance. Students when in
clinical practice come across obstacles that decrease their learning experience. By compacting a
lot of material in a short period of time, skepticism is an outcome and impacts the nurse’s
perception of the student’s competency. The student must present themselves in a way where
their competency is assessed positively. The independent variable is the qualitative data found in
this research. In the design of this study, information gathered relied on diary information, focus
groups, and practice documentation. Participants were expected to capture their experiences in a
written format by keeping a diary, participate in interviews in 6 month intervals that lasted 60 to
90 minutes. According to, (Stacey et al., 2015) eight participants chose to take part and engaged
in this study for the full duration of 2 years. Therefor operational definitions were clearly defined
in this research study, they are also concrete and measurable.
Stacy et a., (2015) hypothesized professional socialization involves a process of
compliance as opposed to conformity which can entail a degree of internal conflict where
personal values are compromised. It also seen that the individual’s performance deviates, due to
the role expectation, moral obligation, and the interaction with others.
The design used in this study is qualitative case study approach, it was use to explore the
student real-life experiences as a new nurse in a clinical setting. This study used inductive
reasoning. It began by observation of the lack of qualitative research of graduate entry nurses
experience, students were placed in a clinical setting to gather experiences. The data was the
analyzed and reviewed for validity, and lastly disclosing the findings.
CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
4
The sample size of this study consists of a cohort of eight Graduate Entry Nursing (GEN)
student participants, with ages ranging from 20 – 40, previous education consisted of foreign
language degree, science degree, arts degree and one with masters in therapeutic intervention.
Previous health care related experience is a variation of none, criminal justice services, learning
disability charitable organization, and youth work counseling. Twelve practice assessors that
took part in the assessment of the GEN student were also asked to participate. Assessor field of
practice includes adult and mental practice. Years of registration was 8 – 34 years. The
investigator in this research study choose probability sampling, samples were gathered giving all
individuals in the population equal chances of being selected. Valid tools used in this research
consisted of existing theoretical suppositions and compared themes from student focus group,
and diary feedback. Ethical consideration was taken. Approval was requested from the host
institution Faculty Medical Research Ethics Committee (Stacy et al, 2015). Due to the dual role
of the researcher and lecturer, and the potential risk of coercion.
Data analysis was gathered using theoretic supposition, this allows generalized thought
process and pattern matching. The results from the research study are presented in a comparable
format. The finding consists of four suppositions, each one also includes student accounts,
followed by feedback from practice assessors, and lastly the researches finding. The first
supposition is “Current nurse education is failing to promote capability, critically and flexibility
amongst the nursing workforce. Students account is that there is still low priority of teaching un
the clinical environment. There is a student perception that practitioners are too busy to help with
the learning of new nurses. As a result, student nurses help performing other task that have no
value to their student nurse learning. Allowing some skepticism in regards to the new nurse
competency.
CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
5
The feedback gathered from the assessor, includes the ability to fit in the amount of
knowledge and skills needed in a shorter period of then what the mentor completed. The finding
that from the researcher was, students must present their selves in a confident manner. Student
had to engage in finding performance approaches, to not have their competency questioned. This
evolved them doing procedures that they didn’t feel comfortable doing. Participant #5 disclosed
that throughout training she receive good feedback on the questions and opinions she gave.
However, her mentor received different feedback from the assessor such as being arrogant and
overconfident, being that she is in the stage of training. Moral distressed was documented in the
part of professional socialization.
Structure of the study is considered a strength for this article. As for limitations of the
study were identified within the findings. The structure of how to achieve the data by creating an
objective helped direct the research. Also this research was based on dairy interviews, focus
groups, and practice trials. The limitations of this research corresponds to the findings of the
researcher towards one group. The relevance of the findings only relates to one cohort of nursing
students, the claims made in the research cannot relate to other cohorts. More research would
need to be done in order for the research to be relevant to other populations. The significance of
this research is valid towards nursing because of the focus towards the students and their
performance and experience in the nursing program.
6
CRITIQUE RESEARCH ARTICLE
Reference
Stacey, G., Pollock, K., & Crawford, P. (2015). A case study exploring the experience of graduate entry
nursing students when learning in practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(9), 2084-2095.
doi:10.1111/jan.12673

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more