A 5 paragraph argumentative essay that includes a thesis statement a body and an conclusion compares

  

A 5 paragraph argumentative essay that includes a thesis statement a body and an conclusion compares and contrasts 2 speeches one by Elie Wiesel “ the perils of indifference” and the other by Susan b Anthony “women’s right to vote” using examples from the text to support points
safari___jul_9__2019_at_8_17_pm.pdf

safari___jul_9__2019_at_8_17_pm.pdf

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A 5 paragraph argumentative essay that includes a thesis statement a body and an conclusion compares
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

safari___jul_9__2019_at_8_17_pm.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

http://www.sojust.net/speeches/susananthony.html
!
Go
JAN FEB MAY
17
39 captures
2013 2015 2016
3 May 2006 – 3 Oct 2018
Speeches on Social Justice
Quick Links:
Home | Back to Speeches | EdChange | Multicultural Pavilion | Shop | Tell a Friend | Email
Us
On Women’s Right to Vote
by Susan B. Anthony
1872
Philadelphia, PA
Search
Susan B. Anthony delivered this address when she
illegally cast a vote during the 1872 presidential
elections. Her vote was illegal because women did
not have the right to vote at the time.
Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you
tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of
having voted at the last presidential election,
without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my
work this evening to prove to you that in thus
voting, I not only committed no crime, but,
instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights,
guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by
the National Constitution, beyond the power of any
state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal
Constitution says:
We, the people of the United
States, in order to form a more
perfect union, establish justice,
insure domestic tranquillity,
provide for the common defense,
promote the general welfare, and
secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves and our posterity, do
ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United
States of America.
It was we, the people; not we, the
white male citizens; nor yet we, the
male citizens; but we, the whole
people, who formed the Union. And
we formed it, not to give the
blessings of liberty, but to secure
them; not to the half of ourselves
and the half of our posterity, but to
the whole people – women as well as
men. And it is a downright mockery
to talk to women of their enjoyment
of the blessings of liberty while they
are denied the use of the only
means of securing them provided by
this democratic-republican
government — the ballot.
For any state to make sex a
qualification that must ever result in
the disfranchisement of one entire half of the
people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post
facto law, and is therefore a violation of the
supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of
liberty are forever withheld from women and their
female posterity.
To them this government has no just powers
derived from the consent of the governed. To them
this government is not a democracy. It is not a
republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful
oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever
established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy
of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An
oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern
the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where
the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but
this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers,
husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and
sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household
– which ordains all men sovereigns, all women
subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion
into every home of the nation. Webster, Worcester,
and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in
the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are
women persons? And I hardly believe any of our
opponents will have the hardihood to say they are
not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and
no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce
any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or
immunities. Hence, every discrimination against
women in the constitutions and laws of the several
states is today null and void, precisely as is every
one against Negroes.
Home | Speeches | Declarations | Acts | Literature | Letters | Songs | Essays | Poetry |
Email Us
SoJust is an EdChange project
© Paul C. Gorski, 2006-2015
⍰❎
f %
▾ About this capture
http://www.sojust.net/speeches/susananthony.html
!
Go
JAN FEB MAY
17
39 captures
2013 2015 2016
3 May 2006 – 3 Oct 2018
Speeches on Social Justice
Quick Links:
Home | Back to Speeches | EdChange | Multicultural Pavilion | Shop | Tell a Friend | Email
Us
On Women’s Right to Vote
by Susan B. Anthony
1872
Philadelphia, PA
Search
Susan B. Anthony delivered this address when she
illegally cast a vote during the 1872 presidential
elections. Her vote was illegal because women did
not have the right to vote at the time.
Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you
tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of
having voted at the last presidential election,
without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my
work this evening to prove to you that in thus
voting, I not only committed no crime, but,
instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights,
guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by
the National Constitution, beyond the power of any
state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal
Constitution says:
We, the people of the United
States, in order to form a more
perfect union, establish justice,
insure domestic tranquillity,
provide for the common defense,
promote the general welfare, and
secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves and our posterity, do
ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United
States of America.
It was we, the people; not we, the
white male citizens; nor yet we, the
male citizens; but we, the whole
people, who formed the Union. And
we formed it, not to give the
blessings of liberty, but to secure
them; not to the half of ourselves
and the half of our posterity, but to
the whole people – women as well as
men. And it is a downright mockery
to talk to women of their enjoyment
of the blessings of liberty while they
are denied the use of the only
means of securing them provided by
this democratic-republican
government — the ballot.
For any state to make sex a
qualification that must ever result in
the disfranchisement of one entire half of the
people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post
facto law, and is therefore a violation of the
supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of
liberty are forever withheld from women and their
female posterity.
To them this government has no just powers
derived from the consent of the governed. To them
this government is not a democracy. It is not a
republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful
oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever
established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy
of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An
oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern
the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where
the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but
this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers,
husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and
sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household
– which ordains all men sovereigns, all women
subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion
into every home of the nation. Webster, Worcester,
and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in
the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are
women persons? And I hardly believe any of our
opponents will have the hardihood to say they are
not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and
no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce
any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or
immunities. Hence, every discrimination against
women in the constitutions and laws of the several
states is today null and void, precisely as is every
one against Negroes.
Home | Speeches | Declarations | Acts | Literature | Letters | Songs | Essays | Poetry |
Email Us
SoJust is an EdChange project
© Paul C. Gorski, 2006-2015
⍰❎
f %
▾ About this capture
http://www.sojust.net/speeches/susananthony.html
!
Go
JAN FEB MAY
17
39 captures
2013 2015 2016
3 May 2006 – 3 Oct 2018
Speeches on Social Justice
Quick Links:
Home | Back to Speeches | EdChange | Multicultural Pavilion | Shop | Tell a Friend | Email
Us
On Women’s Right to Vote
by Susan B. Anthony
1872
Philadelphia, PA
Search
Susan B. Anthony delivered this address when she
illegally cast a vote during the 1872 presidential
elections. Her vote was illegal because women did
not have the right to vote at the time.
Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you
tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of
having voted at the last presidential election,
without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my
work this evening to prove to you that in thus
voting, I not only committed no crime, but,
instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights,
guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by
the National Constitution, beyond the power of any
state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal
Constitution says:
We, the people of the United
States, in order to form a more
perfect union, establish justice,
insure domestic tranquillity,
provide for the common defense,
promote the general welfare, and
secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves and our posterity, do
ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United
States of America.
It was we, the people; not we, the
white male citizens; nor yet we, the
male citizens; but we, the whole
people, who formed the Union. And
we formed it, not to give the
blessings of liberty, but to secure
them; not to the half of ourselves
and the half of our posterity, but to
the whole people – women as well as
men. And it is a downright mockery
to talk to women of their enjoyment
of the blessings of liberty while they
are denied the use of the only
means of securing them provided by
this democratic-republican
government — the ballot.
For any state to make sex a
qualification that must ever result in
the disfranchisement of one entire half of the
people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post
facto law, and is therefore a violation of the
supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of
liberty are forever withheld from women and their
female posterity.
To them this government has no just powers
derived from the consent of the governed. To them
this government is not a democracy. It is not a
republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful
oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever
established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy
of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An
oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern
the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where
the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but
this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers,
husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and
sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household
– which ordains all men sovereigns, all women
subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion
into every home of the nation. Webster, Worcester,
and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in
the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are
women persons? And I hardly believe any of our
opponents will have the hardihood to say they are
not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and
no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce
any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or
immunities. Hence, every discrimination against
women in the constitutions and laws of the several
states is today null and void, precisely as is every
one against Negroes.
Home | Speeches | Declarations | Acts | Literature | Letters | Songs | Essays | Poetry |
Email Us
SoJust is an EdChange project
© Paul C. Gorski, 2006-2015
⍰❎
f %
▾ About this capture

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more