4-6 pages lengthAPA FormatGRADING RUBRIC MUST BE FOLLOWED TO THE LETTEROverview As a leader in your

  

4-6 pages lengthAPA FormatGRADING RUBRIC MUST BE FOLLOWED TO THE LETTEROverview As a leader in your school, you may be asked to develop action plans in the implementation of a variety of initiatives. In this assignment, discuss your ideas for presenting a plan of action to a diverse group of stakeholders, including colleagues, decision makers, parents, and community members. Instructions Part 1: Plan Address the following in your plan: Briefly describe the plan you will be promoting in your presentation.Your plan should involve the implementation of an educational innovation, preferably related to educational technology.Analyze the makeup of the stakeholder audience to which you would present your plan of action; this group could include colleagues, decision makers, parents, and community members.Provide a rationale for your choice of occasion and venue for the presentation.For example, would you present to the school faculty at a faculty meeting? Or would you present to the school board at a board meeting?Justify the topics you would address with this group at this occasion and venue.Analyze the main points that would be needed to persuade all stakeholders.How could you address their key concerns? How will you support your contentions? Will you refer to the professional literature or personal experience? Why or why not?Write a 3-minute introduction designed to grab your audience’s attention and persuade them to listen attentively to your presentation. Resources: The Process of School Change PRINTChange in schools has been studied from various models, including Systems Theory, Fullan’s Educational Change Model, and Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory. From these resources, you will examine varying and divergent views on how educational change occurs. You are encouraged to pay close attention to the roles and responsibilities of individuals and groups who engage in and impact the change process.Gundy, M. S., & Berger, M. J. (2016). Towards a model supporting educational change. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 232–235. Retrieved from http://www.ijiet.org/vol6/691-EI1006.pdfLoogma, K., Tafel-Viia, K., & Ümarik, M. (2013). Conceptualising educational changes: A social innovation approach. Journal of Educational Change, 14(3), 283–301.Moreno, C., Luria, D., & Mojkowski, C. (2013). The latest twist on spreading innovation: One school at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 8–11.Ogawa, R. T. (2015). Change of mind: How organization theory led me to move from studying educational reform to pursuing educational design. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 794–804.Stoll, L. (2013). Systemwide reform under pressure: A global perspective on learning and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 564–570.White, D. G., & Levin, J. A. (2016). Navigating the turbulent waters of school reform guided by complexity theory. Complicity, 13(1), 43–80.Wood, P. (2017). Overcoming the problem of embedding change in educational organizations: A perspective from normalization process theory. Management in Education, 31(1), 33–38. Resources: Stakeholders and Sustainable Innovation PRINTA rationale is a justification. As such, it must go beyond verification—the citing of examples that support your contentions. Stakeholders who are being asked to commit time and energy to a change initiative are less interested in how the innovation worked in other settings than they are in seeing how it would work in their own situation and why. That explicit alignment emerges from a critical analysis of the specifics of the culture into which you are proposing to intrude with your innovation, and that analysis must reflect theory and best practice from the professional literature.Collinson, V., & Cook, T. (2013). Organizational learning: Leading innovations. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 1(1). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/ijelm.2013.03Iriti, J., Bickel, W., Schunn, C. & Stein, M. K. (2016). Maximizing research and development resources: Identifying and testing “load-bearing conditions” for educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 64(2), 245–262.Paxton, D., & Van Stralen, S. (2015). Developing collaborative and innovative leadership: Practices for fostering a new mindset. The Journal of Leadership Education, 14(4), 11–25.Schultz, K., & McGinn, K. C. (2013). “No one cares about this community more than us”: The role of listening, participation, and trust in a small urban district. Urban Education, 48(6), 767–797.Research Guide – Education Technology and Innovation Through these resources, you will examine how stakeholders can engage in and sustain change and how to persuade them to do so. Resources: Persuasion and Credibility PRINT Persuasion and Credibility Persuasive Speech Structure
grading_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
4-6 pages lengthAPA FormatGRADING RUBRIC MUST BE FOLLOWED TO THE LETTEROverview As a leader in your
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

1. Analyzes the makeup of the stakeholder audience to which the plan will be presented by
citing the professional literature on diffusion of innovation theory.
2. Justifies choices about the presentation, including occasion, venue, and the topics to be
addressed, and impartially explains the pros and cons of other choices.
3. Analyzes the main points that would be needed to persuade all stakeholders and aligns
persuasive strategies with specific stakeholder adoption groups.
4. Writes and presents a 3-minute introduction that is designed to grab the audience’s
attention and persuade them to listen attentively and that exceeds graduate-level
expectations for verbal and nonverbal communication.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more